It appears for usage having particular verbs or even in an excellent specific feeling of the new verb

/bi-/ could have been said having locative-terminative push as opposed to purely locative push to possess /ba-/, however, Thomsen says on p. 184, that it “is most likely perhaps not immediately used for why of concord which have an effective loc.-identity. otherwise loc. noun, but it instead caters to the latest semantic distinction of verb. “

>ba(I): provides a good separative form. When you look at the OBGT it closely correlates with >Akkadian t-stems. (Thomsen, following the Jacobsen, confuses t-stems >with the Akkadian perfect.) Their status was once the brand new ventive >marker m and then the b was absorbed: m-ba- > m-ma, and if that is >accompanied by a 2nd people pronoun, it will become meters-ma > m-mu (therefore ba >is not always easy to understand). Regarding lack of the fresh >ventive marker they takes up the first reputation about chain, right after which they >dont continually be notable regarding ba(II). A definite circumstances is >ba-ne-su8-be2-dentro de-de3-dentro de = ni-it-tal2-lak cu-nu-ci = i go away >on them (OBGT VII, 305). > >ba(II): enjoys good stative/passive means. Into the OBGT VI, it’s made of the >a-c-base stative/passive, otherwise a keen Nt-base passive. Appear to, ba(II) >takes up the first reputation throughout the strings. ba-ab-gar, ba-ab-gar-re-en >= cuckun, cuckunaku = he’s got come placed / I have been set >(because of the someone unnamed). The fresh forms ba-gar, ba-gar-re-en, . ba-na-gar, >ba-na-gar-re-durante for the OBGT VI, contours 160-165, is actually uncertain; they can >as an alternative getting interpreted because the ba(I), especially the next show, >that is one or two-participant, in addition to OB grammarian, exactly who made them >of the Nt-stem passives, nicely managed the brand new ambiguity. > >Their statement certainly relates to ba(II), but Really don’t found it just good >case of preference, immediately following you’ve got set ba(I) apart. Of course, it is >method beyond my personal resources and you can my competence to test my over >syntactical/lexical claims https://datingranking.net/cs/minichat-recenze from unilingual texts. > >With my all the best, >Peter J. Huber

I was thinking of all the intransitive phrases that stop with ba-Root, including ba-gul, “it was destroyed”. Because you say, those fall-in the class out of ba(II).

I’d possess thought it had been an excellent >Hebrew term, however once more, I am not sure the relationship of one’s Sumerian >language while the Hebrew vocabulary

Thank you for taking the time to try and clarify so it situation. I will attempt to summary what Hayes has on pages 162 and you may 256: He agrees you to scholars has actually speculated that there can be a few ba- conjugation prefixes which might be homonyms. “You’re seen mainly into the passive phrases, others when you look at the reduced definable contexts.” Along with, new conjugation prefix bi2- often takes place having affordable phrases in the locative-terminative situation in addition to conjugation prefix ba- either happen with nominal sentences on the locative case. “It is primarily the development from co-thickness which includes led multiple scholars to close out that bi2- and ba- commonly of the identical score since almost every other conjugation prefixes, consequently they are probably consisting of multiple ability.” Therefore you to definitely sort of ba- may include a feature you to definitely stands for the newest locative situation. To possess a great separative definition, you expect to track down Sumerian affordable phrases end towards ablative postposition -ta.

Notice new discreet improvement >built in OBGT VI, contours 79-84, involving the normal G-stalk stative >in addition to C-base stative/passive: an-gar, an-gar-re-dentro de = cakin, >caknaku = he is set, I’m place, vs

>I happened to be wanting to know for those who you’ll address a question for me personally. I’ve see somewhere >the label “Eden” try a great Sumerian keyword. > >Anyway, in the event that Paradise, Adam, and/otherwise Eve try Sumerian conditions, might you >please let me know whether they have an interpretation/meaning?

EDIN are a Sumerian word, however it refers to the steppe house among them canals, where herd dogs grazed.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.